SCRIPT STUDIO VERSUS FINAL DRAFT HOW TO
SCRIPT STUDIO VERSUS FINAL DRAFT PRO
SCRIPT STUDIO VERSUS FINAL DRAFT SOFTWARE

If you want an all-in-one solution with structure, beat management, easy to re-position scenes, and very intuitive writing. The screenwriting part is also good but not as feature rich as Final Draft. REALLY great for managing structure and story arcs. It's basically the Final Draft beat board with mutliple story arcs visually represented in a story board. Probably the best tool for planning narrative structure. It seems like there are new features every week.

SCRIPT STUDIO VERSUS FINAL DRAFT PRO

But if you are just moving beats around and managing a narrative structure board and index cards, use Arc Studio Pro or Final Draft (or a stand-alone cork board program).Īrc Studio Pro: Very active developers. If you have a TON of background material and reference stuff like web pages and images, use it for planning. Scrivener: Great for organizing and planning but pretty awful for actual screenwriting. I like it a lot but haven't used it much, as I pretty much prefer Final Draft. Not as robust as Final Draft but perfectly acceptable for writers who don't need a lot of collaboration or beat management. The new enhancements to the beat board and story board make it much better as a planning tool than Fade In, although they are very similar in terms of actual screenplay writing.įade In: Really great. I own Fade In, Final Draft, Scrivener 3, Arc Studio Pro, and WriterDuet.įinal Draft: Just all around feels the most natural. Much of this is really just user preference. If you wanted to play guitar, would you be upset if it costs $100 once, and then you could play and learn all on your own? Not that I hold it against them, but I'd prefer to work off FD.Įdit 2: Also, I feel like this sub has a bent against FD, so most responses you get will say to avoid it. I haven't tried Fade In, so can't weigh in on that.Įdit: The reason I have WD premium is because I collaborate with people who also have WD.

I have both btw, but prefer FD even though WD is a little better at guessing what comes next. Subscriptions trick you into thinking they aren't that expensive, but if you write for two years you've spent 140% more than you would have on FD. For 2, if you're serious about writing you'll probably splurge on the $10/mo subscription (it makes saving and sharing multiple drafts and screenplays much easier) but I'd way rather pay $100 once than have a $10/month account. For one, you need internet access, which is annoying when you're out of the house in a café or library or wherever.

Maybe it's because I learned on it, but I'm a fan.

SCRIPT STUDIO VERSUS FINAL DRAFT HOW TO

I haven't had problems with it in a long time, and it taught me how to format properly. Just want to put in my $0.02 for Final Draft.

SCRIPT STUDIO VERSUS FINAL DRAFT SOFTWARE

I just want to write and let the software do its thing. I don’t want to stop and format it every step of the way. I don’t want to act like I’m coding my screenplay. That process itself is just very annoying. Where as, in highland you have to stop and write the character’s name in all caps, which the software recognises as a character name. Which means my thought between one character’s dialogue and the other person’s reaction or dialogue is just unbroken. Then I press enter and then the tab button the next character just shows up. I write one character name then write dialogue. FD is the only thing that gets out of the way and just lets me rip. When you’re writing dialogues, especially a kind of rapid fire dialogue between two people, you just want to write and not stop and worry about formatting. Both feels less intuitive for me than FD. I don’t know why a lot of people here hate FD.

Script studio versus final draft